• 我要登录|
  • 免费注册
    |
  • 我的丁香通
    • 企业机构:
    • 成为企业机构
    • 个人用户:
    • 个人中心
  • 移动端
    移动端
丁香通 logo丁香实验_LOGO
搜实验

    大家都在搜

      大家都在搜

        0 人通过求购买到了急需的产品
        免费发布求购
        发布求购
        点赞
        收藏
        wx-share
        分享

        SOLiD quality data

        互联网

        1876

        Q:We recently completed a ChIP-seq run on the ABI SOLiD. We received the following data back for one of our samples. These data were from a quarter (1/4) of a slide.

        ------------------
        61993194 total beads found
        Total Beads
        0 mismatches 5631945 ( 9.08%)
        1 mismatches 5976039 ( 9.64%) 11607984 ( 18.72%)
        2 mismatches 5155084 ( 8.32%) 16763068 ( 27.04%)
        3 mismatches 4243237 ( 6.84%) 21006305 ( 33.88%)

        Uniquely Placed Beads
        0 mismatches 3957369 ( 6.38%)
        1 mismatches 4341342 ( 7.00%) 8298711 ( 13.39%)
        2 mismatches 3894787 ( 6.28%) 12193498 ( 19.67%)
        3 mismatches 3351175 ( 5.41%) 15544673 ( 25.07%)

        Errors within Uniquely Placed Tags
        Total Errors 22184388
        Single Errors 19528902 (88.03% of Total)
        Adjacent Errors 1355877 (12.22% of total)
        Valid 716317 (6.46% of Total) (52.83% of Adjacent Errors)
        Invalid 639560 (5.77% of Total) (47.17% of Adjacent Errors)

        Starting Points within Uniquely Placed Tags
        Number of Starting Points 15186453
        Average Number of Reads per Start Point 1.02

        Starting Points within Uniquely and Randomly Placed Tags
        Number of Starting Points 19891182
        Average Number of Reads per Start Point 1.06

        Coverage of Uniquely Placed Tags
        Bases Not Covered 2643970633(85.08%)
        ---------------

        Do these numbers look promising to others as far as sequences covered? Are these similar to other people? The samples were human and were mapped to HG18 reference genome. The unique placement of sequences seems low to me from the data ABI was quoting (5mil total). I apologize for lack of detail, however I want to get opinions without biasing people.

        A:It looks like you have 15mil uniqely aligned reads, not 5 mil? I think that is a very good number for 1/4 of a slide. Is this 35 bp reads? If it is longer you may need to allow for more mismatches.

        A:yes, sorry, 15 million, I forgot the 1 in front of the 5! ABI was projecting >20 mil. They are 35bp reads. Thanks for the input, just want to know how our run stacked up with others.

        A:62 Million beads for a quad is on the very high end of normal. The manual officially recommends 30M.

        You can recover quite a few more mapping reads by filtering as suggesting in Cloonan, et al...iteratively filtering and trimming.

        ad image
        提问
        扫一扫
        丁香实验小程序二维码
        实验小助手
        丁香实验公众号二维码
        扫码领资料
        反馈
        TOP
        打开小程序