Assessment of Motor Coordination and Balance in Mice Using the Rotarod, Elevated Bridge, and Footprint Tests
互联网
- Abstract
- Table of Contents
- Materials
- Figures
- Literature Cited
Abstract
In order fully to utilize animal models of disease states, to test experimental therapeutics, and to understand the underlying pathophysiology of neurodegenerative disease, behavioral characterization of the model is essential. Deterioration of normal motor function within a disease state signals the progression of an underlying pathological process, and identifies disease?sensitive time points according to which the onset of therapeutic trials may be scheduled. Deterioration in the performance of motor tasks may also indicate the point when motor deficits begin to compromise our ability to measure other deficits within cognitive and behavioral domains. In acute therapeutic trials, the separation of motor from cognitive or behavioral function may be crucial in determining the functional specificity of the drug effect. If we are to accurately measure motor performance in disease progression or during drug trials, tests of motor function that have been highly optimized with respect to sensitivity must be applied. Since motor coordination and balance are essential to normal motor function, tests that probe these facets are ideal for the purpose. In this chapter, we describe in detail three test protocols that principally measure motor coordination (the rotarod and footprint tests) and balance (the elevated bridge test) in mice. Curr. Protoc. Mouse Biol. 2:37?53 © 2012 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Keywords: rotarod; elevated bridge; footprint; gait; balance; coordination; motor tests; mice
Table of Contents
- Introduction
- Basic Protocol 1: Measuring Motor Coordination and Balance on the Rotarod
- Basic Protocol 2: Measuring Motor Coordination and Balance on the Elevated Bridge
- Basic Protocol 3: Gait Analysis Using the Footprint Test
- Commentary
- Literature Cited
- Figures
Materials
Basic Protocol 1: Measuring Motor Coordination and Balance on the Rotarod
Materials
Basic Protocol 2: Measuring Motor Coordination and Balance on the Elevated Bridge
Materials
Basic Protocol 3: Gait Analysis Using the Footprint Test
Materials
|
Figures
-
Figure 1. A commercial rotarod apparatus (A ) with digital interface (B ). Note that the newer models have electronic gearing with an older gearing system depicted in (C ). View Image -
Figure 2. Progressive decline in rotarod performance in the HdhQ150 Huntington's disease mouse model, over 4 to 16 months of age. View Image -
Figure 3. The elevated bridge apparatus set up for the photograph without the video recording system (A ). The goal box and “start” and/or “stop” marks are clearly visible in white on each picture. Note the ledge on the beam (B ), which makes foot slips (C ) easier to record. View Image -
Figure 4. A typical data set from the R6/1 Huntington's disease mouse model on the elevated bridge apparatus. Measures of turn (A ) and crossing (B ) latencies, along with fore‐limb (C ) and hind‐limb (D ) foot slips all indicate progressive impairment in the transgenic mice. View Image -
Figure 5. (A ) Narrow corridor apparatus used for gait analysis. (B ) Mouse leaving painted footprints, using blue paint on the two forepaws and red paint on the two hind paws. (C ) Illustration of the measurements taken to collect stride length, fore and hindpaw base, and right and left overlap. View Image -
Figure 6. Sample data from Q150 Huntington's disease mouse model on stride and gait analysis test. (A ) Stride length of transgenic and wild‐type mice for hind‐paw and fore‐paw strides. (B ) Base width hind‐paw and forepaw steps of transgenic and wild‐type mice. View Image
Videos
Literature Cited
Literature Cited | |
Amende, I., Kale, A., McCue, S., Glazier, S., Morgan, J.P., and Hampton, T.G. 2005. Gait dynamics in mouse models of Parkinson's disease and Huntington's disease. J. Neuroeng. Rehabil. 2:20. | |
Bensadoun, J.C., Déglon, N., Tseng, J.L., Ridet, J.L., Zurn, A.D., and Aebischer, P. 2000. Lentiviral vectors as a gene delivery system in the mouse midbrain: Cellular and behavioral improvements in a 6‐OHDA model of Parkinson's disease using GDNF. Exp. Neurol. 164:15–24. | |
Brooks, S.P., Pask, T., Jones, L., and Dunnett, S.B. 2004. Behavioural profiles of inbred mouse strains used as transgenic backgrounds. I: motor tests. Genes Brain Behav. 3:206‐215. | |
Carter, R.J., Lione, L.A., Humby, T., Mangiarini, L., Mahal, A., Bates, G.P., Dunnett, S.B., and Morton, A.J. 1999. Characterization of progressive motor deficits in mice transgenic for the human Huntington's disease mutation. J. Neurosci. 19:3248–3257. | |
Clarke, K.A. and Still, J. 1999. Gait analysis in the mouse. Physiol. Behav. 66:723–729. | |
Clarke, K.A. and Still, J. 2001. Development and consistency of gait in the mouse. Physiol. Behav. 73:159–164. | |
Dunnett, S.B. 2003. Assessment of motor impairments in transgenic mice. In Mouse Behavioral Phenotyping (J.N. Crawley, ed.) pp. 1‐12. Society for Neuroscience, Washington D.C. | |
Hilber, P. and Caston, J. 2001. Motor skills and motor learning in Lurcher mutant mice during aging. Neuroscience 102:615–623. | |
Kent, S., Hurd, M., and Satinoff, E. 1991. Interactions between body temperature and wheel running over the estrous cycle in rats. Physiol. Behav. 49:1079–1084. | |
Kirik, D., Rosenblad, C., and Bjorklund, A. 2000. Preservation of a functional nigrostriatal dopamine pathway by GDNF in the intrastriatal 6‐OHDA lesion model depends on the site of administration of the trophic factor. Eur. J. Neurosci. 12:3871–3882. | |
Lalonde, R., Hayzoun, K., Selimi, F., Mariani, J., and Strazielle, C. 2003. Motor coordination in mice with hotfoot, Lurcher, and double mutations of the Grid2 gene encoding the delta‐2 excitatory amino acid receptor. Physiol. Behav. 80:333–339. | |
McFadyen, M.P., Kusek, G., Bolivar, V.J., and Flaherty, L. 2003. Differences among eight inbred strains of mice in motor ability and motor learning on a rotorod. Genes Brain Behav. 2:214–219. | |
Moffitt, H., McPhail, G.D., Woodman, B., Hobbs, C., and Bates, G.P. 2009. Formation of polyglutamine inclusions in a wide range of non‐CNS tissues in the HdhQ150 knock‐in mouse model of Huntington's disease. PLoS. One 4:e8025. | |
Monville, C., Torres, E.M., and Dunnett, S.B. 2006. Comparison of incremental and accelerating protocols of the rotarod test for the assessment of motor deficits in the 6‐OHDA model. J. Neurosci. Methods 158:219–223. | |
Sathasivam, K., Hobbs, C., Turmaine, M., Mangiarini, L., Mahal, A., Bertaux, F., Wanker, E.E., Doherty, P., Davies, S.W., and Bates, G.P. 1999. Formation of polyglutamine inclusions in non‐CNS tissue. Hum. Mol. Genet. 8:813–822. | |
Schallert, T., Woodlee, M.T., and Fleming, S.M. 2003. Experimental focal ischemic injury: Behavior‐brain interactions and issues of animal handling and housing. ILAR. J. 44:130–143. | |
Tarantino, L.M., Gould, T.J., Druhan, J.P., and Bucan, M. 2000. Behavior and mutagenesis screens: The importance of baseline analysis of inbred strains. Mamm. Genome 11:555–564. | |
Wooley, C.M., Sher, R.B., Kale, A., Frankel, W.N., Cox, G.A., and Seburn, K.L. 2005. Gait analysis detects early changes in transgenic SOD1(G93A) mice. Muscle Nerve 32:43–50. |