Single and Dual Birthdating Procedures for Assessing the Response of Adult Neural Stem Cells to the Infusion of a Soluble Factor Using Halogenated Thy
互联网
- Abstract
- Table of Contents
- Materials
- Figures
- Literature Cited
Abstract
The factors that regulate the switch from adult neural stem cell (aNSC) quiescence to active proliferation are poorly understood. Here we describe a method to study the in vivo effect of a soluble factor on cell cycle entry and proliferation of aNSCs located in the brain neurogenic niches. First, we provide information for implanting osmotic minipumps that will deliver the compound of interest directly into the mouse brain. When combined with the administration of the thymidine analog bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU), this technique is the most basic procedure to study the effects of a soluble factor on aNSC proliferation. We also describe a dual replication labeling protocol using two different halogenated thymidine analogs, chloro? and iododeoxyuridine (CldU and IdU), that allows tracking of proliferating cells and assessing cell cycle re?entry of aNSCs at different time points. Curr. Protoc. Stem Cell Biol. 21:2D.10.1?2D.10.20. © 2012 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Keywords: neural stem cell; label?retaining cell; IdU; CldU; BrdU; intracerebroventricular infusion; osmotic minipump
Table of Contents
- Introduction
- Basic Protocol 1: Single Labeling of Actively Proliferating Cells to Analyze the Short‐Term Effect of a Soluble Factor on aNSCs
- Basic Protocol 2: Dual Labeling of Two Cell Division Rounds to Analyze the Long‐Term Effect of a Soluble Factor on aNSCs
- Reagents and Solutions
- Commentary
- Literature Cited
- Figures
- Tables
Materials
Basic Protocol 1: Single Labeling of Actively Proliferating Cells to Analyze the Short‐Term Effect of a Soluble Factor on aNSCs
Materials
Basic Protocol 2: Dual Labeling of Two Cell Division Rounds to Analyze the Long‐Term Effect of a Soluble Factor on aNSCs
Materials
|
Figures
-
Figure 2.D1.1 Single‐labeling procedure to analyze the short‐term effect of a soluble factor on aNSCs proliferation. (A ) Schematic outline of the experimental design employed for pump implantation, factor delivery, and BrdU injection. (B ) Diagram showing the possible output of BrdU labeling depending on the mode of aNSC division. Active aNSCs can divide symmetrically (left) to generate two aNSCs, expanding the stem cell pool, or asymmetrically (right) to give rise to a stem cell and a linage‐restricted progenitor cell. (C, D ) Confocal images of a triple immunofluorescence showing SOX2+ GFAP+ aNSCs stained for BrdU in SVZ (C) and SGZ (D). Arrows point at active aNSCs that were proliferating during BrdU administration. Scale bars, 10 µm. GCL, granular cell layer; LV, lateral ventricle; SGZ, subgranular zone; St, striatum. View Image -
Figure 2.D1.2 Preparation of the brain infusion assembly and surgical procedures for the placement of the cannula and ALZET osmotic pump. Preparation of the assembly : (A ) Load the minipump with the solution to be delivered or with sterile saline solution using a syringe. (B ) Assemble the flow moderator, catheter tube, and cannula. Fill the brain infusion assembly with sterile saline solution. (C ) Connect the minipump to the brain infusion assembly, submerge the filled device in sterile saline solution, and incubate at 37°C overnight. Surgical procedures : (D ) Make a rostro‐caudal incision using the scalpel. Prepare a subcutaneous pocket in the back of the mouse. This pocket is created by gently pushing a rounded‐tip scissors from the scalp incision toward the midscapular area. Finally, place the pump in the back of the animal under the skin. (E ) Once the skull is exposed and the periosteal connective tissue has been removed, locate bregma and lambda sutures to determine the site for cannula placement [blue dot, AP 0.0 (0 mm to bregma), L ‐ 0.7 (0.7 mm right from mid‐sagittal line)]. Drill a hole and descend the cannula until the base pedestal reaches the skull. Seal with surgical glue. The stereotaxic coordinates for the lateral ventricle (red dot, corresponding to the final location reached by the tip of the cannula) are AP 0.0, ML ‐ 0.7 and DV 3.0 (3 mm below bregma, determined by the cannula's depth). LV, lateral ventricle; AP, anteroposterior; ML, mediolateral; and DV, dorsoventral. View Image -
Figure 2.D1.3 Dual labeling procedure to analyze the long‐term effect of a soluble factor on aNSC. (A ) Schematic outline of the experimental design employed for infusion and for the administration of CldU and IdU. (B ) Diagram showing the possible labeling of different cell types after the sequential administration of the thymidine analogs. CldU+ cells correspond to LRCs, while CldU+ cells co‐labeled with IdU+ are considered as active LRCs, as they were cycling again during IdU administration. Single IdU+ cells are either aNSCs or progenitors that were not cycling during CldU injection. (C, D ) Confocal images of a double CldU/IdU immunofluorescence showing CldU+ staining (green), IdU+ staining (red), and merge. CldU+ cells (arrows) and double‐labeled cells (arrowheads) are shown in the merge panels for the SVZ (C) and SGZ (D). Nuclear stain DAPI is shown blue. Scale bar in (C), 10 µm. Scale bar in (D), 15 µm. SGZ, subgranular zone; Spt, septum; St, striatum. View Image -
Figure 2.D1.4 Verification of the anti‐BrdU antisera specificity in mice injected with CldU only and IdU only. The figure shows confocal images that correspond to the titration in SVZ Vibratome sections of the anti‐BrdU Abcam antibody (for CldU detection) and the BD antibody (for IdU detection). Cross‐reactivity was observed at the starting dilution (1:2000, upper panels). The specific signal for CldU was achieved with the Abcam anti‐BrdU antibody diluted 1:20000. The specific signal for IdU was found with the BD anti‐BrdU antibody diluted 1:5000. Scale bar, 50 µm. LV, lateral ventricle; Spt, septum; St, striatum. View Image
Videos
Literature Cited
Bakker, P.J., Stap, J., Tukker, C.J., van Oven, C.H., Veenhof, C.H., and Aten, J. 1991. An indirect immunofluorescence double staining procedure for the simultaneous flow cytometric measurement of iodo‐ and chlorodeoxyuridine incorporated into DNA. Cytometry 12:366‐372. | |
Bauer, S. and Patterson, P.H. 2006. Leukemia inhibitory factor promotes neural stem cell self‐renewal in the adult brain. J. Neurosci. 26:12089‐12099. | |
Bonaguidi, M.A., Peng, C.Y., McGuire, T., Falciglia, G., Gobeske, K.T., Czeisler, C., and Kessler, J.A. 2008. Noggin expands neural stem cells in the adult hippocampus. J. Neurosci. 28:9194‐9204. | |
Bonaguidi, M.A., Wheeler, M.A., Shapiro, J.S., Stadel, R.P., Sun, G.J., Ming, G.L., and Song, H. 2011. In vivo clonal analysis reveals self‐renewing and multipotent adult neural stem cell characteristics. Cell 145:1142‐1155. | |
Craig, C.G., Tropepe, V., Morshead, C.M., Reynolds, B.A., Weiss, S., and van der Kooy, D. 1996. In vivo growth factor expansion of endogenous subependymal neural precursor cell populations in the adult mouse brain. J. Neurosci. 16:2649‐2658. | |
Ferri, A.L., Cavallaro, M., Braida, D., Di Cristofano, A., Canta, A., Vezzani, A., Ottolenghi, S., Pandolfi, P.P., Sala, M., DeBiasi, S., and Nicolis, S.K. 2004. Sox2 deficiency causes neurodegeneration and impaired neurogenesis in the adult mouse brain. Development 131:3805‐3819. | |
Ferron, S.R., Andreu‐Agullo, C., Mira, H., Sanchez, P., Marques‐Torrejon, M.A., and Farinas, I. 2007. A combined ex/in vivo assay to detect effects of exogenously added factors in neural stem cells. Nat. Protoc. 2:849‐859. | |
Jin, K., Zhu, Y., Sun, Y., Mao, X.O., Xie, L., and Greenberg, D.A. 2002. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) stimulates neurogenesis in vitro and in vivo. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 99:11946‐11950. | |
Kempermann, G., Chesler, E.J., Lu, L., Williams, R.W., and Gage, F.H. 2006. Natural variation and genetic covariance in adult hippocampal neurogenesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 103:780‐785. | |
Kippin, T.E., Martens, D.J., and van der, K.D. 2005. p21 loss compromises the relative quiescence of forebrain stem cell proliferation leading to exhaustion of their proliferation capacity. Genes Dev. 19:756‐767. | |
Kuhn, H.G., Winkler, J., Kempermann, G., Thal, L.J., and Gage, F.H. 1997. Epidermal growth factor and fibroblast growth factor‐2 have different effects on neural progenitors in the adult rat brain. J. Neurosci. 17:5820‐5829. | |
Lim, D.A., Huang, Y.C., and Alvarez‐Buylla, A. 2007. The adult neural stem cell niche: Lessons for future neural cell replacement strategies. Neurosurg. Clin. N. Am. 18:81‐92, ix. | |
Llorens‐Martin, M. and Trejo, J.L. 2011. Multiple birthdating analyses in adult neurogenesis: A line‐up of the usual suspects. Front. Neurosci. 5:76. | |
Lugert, S., Basak, O., Knuckles, P., Haussler, U., Fabel, K., Gotz, M., Haas, C.A., Kempermann, G., Taylor, V., and Giachino, C. 2010. Quiescent and active hippocampal neural stem cells with distinct morphologies respond selectively to physiological and pathological stimuli and aging. Cell Stem Cell 6:445‐456. | |
Maslov, A.Y., Barone, T.A., Plunkett, R.J., and Pruitt, S.C. 2004. Neural stem cell detection, characterization, and age‐related changes in the subventricular zone of mice. J Neurosci. 24:1726‐1733. | |
Mira, H., Andreu, Z., Suh, H., Lie, D.C., Jessberger, S., Consiglio, A., San Emeterio, J., Hortiguela, R., Marques‐Torrejon, M.A., Nakashima, K., Colak, D., Gotz, M., Farinas, I., and Gage, F.H. 2010. Signaling through BMPR‐IA regulates quiescence and long‐term activity of neural stem cells in the adult hippocampus. Cell Stem Cell 7:78‐89. | |
Morrison, S.J. and Spradling, A.C. 2008. Stem cells and niches: Mechanisms that promote stem cell maintenance throughout life. Cell 132:598‐611. | |
Morshead, C.M. and van der Kooy, D. 1992. Postmitotic death is the fate of constitutively proliferating cells in the subependymal layer of the adult mouse brain. J. Neurosci. 12:249‐256. | |
Paxinos, G. and Franklin, K.B.J. 2004. The Mouse Brain in Stereotaxic Coordinates: Compact Second Edition. Elsevier Academic Press, London. | |
Petreanu, L. and Alvarez‐Buylla, A. 2002. Maturation and death of adult‐born olfactory bulb granule neurons: Role of olfaction. J. Neurosci. 22:6106‐6113. | |
Ramirez‐Castillejo, C., Sanchez‐Sanchez, F., Andreu‐Agullo, C., Ferron, S.R., Aroca‐Aguilar, J.D., Sanchez, P., Mira, H., Escribano, J., and Farinas, I. 2006. Pigment epithelium‐derived factor is a niche signal for neural stem cell renewal. Nat. Neurosci. 9:331‐339. | |
Stichel, C.C. and Muller, H.W. 1998. The CNS lesion scar: New vistas on an old regeneration barrier. Cell Tissue Res. 294:1‐9. | |
Temple, S. and Alvarez‐Buylla, A. 1999. Stem cells in the adult mammalian central nervous system. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 9:135‐141. | |
Zhao, C., Deng, W., and Gage, F.H. 2008. Mechanisms and functional implications of adult neurogenesis. Cell 132:645‐660. | |
Key References | |
Mira, H., Andreu, Z., Suh, H., Lie, D.C., Jessberger, S., Consiglio, A., San Emeterio, J., Hortigüela, R., Marqués‐Torrejón, M.A., Nakashima, K., Colak, D., Götz, M., Fariñas, I., and Gage, F.H. 2010. Signaling through BMPR‐IA regulates quiescence and long‐term activity of neural stem cells in the adult hippocampus. Cell Stem Cell 7:78‐89. | |
Original citation of the method described in this unit. |