作者信息Kate R Wilcox, Lane Meredith, Aidan Burrell, Bentley Fulcher, Carol L Hodgson, Alisa M Higgins, EXCEL management committee, Laura Adams, Jasmin Board, Annalie Jones, Emma Martin, Vincent Pellegrino, Jayne Sheldrake, Andrew Udy, Magdalena Butler, Keri-Anne Cowdrey, Eileen Gilder, Katie Gill, Alix Gray, Brittany Mason, Alastair McGeorge, Shay McGuinness, Andrew McKee, Phillipa Neal, Rachael Parke, Melissa Robertson, Laura Vui, Hannah Ward, Laura Weiss, Rinaldo Bellomo, Glenn Eastwood, Caleb Fisher, Andrew Hilton, Ary Serpa Neto, Leah Peck, Helen Young, James Bridgett, Debbie Brown, Geraldine Cook, John Dyett, Kym Gellie, Arun Ilancheran, Cheelim Liew, Nicole Robertson, Joanne Zhou, Susan Donnelly, Tash Edmunds, Joshua Heard, Sebastian Lijo, Bree McDonald, Mary Nourse, Sumeet Rai, Manoj Singh, Hemanth Hurkadli Veerendra, Tina Xu, Jonathan Barrett, Kyle Brooks, Gabrielle Hanlon, Laurie Saffer, Chris Allen, Nicholas Anthony, Samantha Bizzell, Edward Litton, Annamaria Palermo, Susan Pellicano, Andrew Bersten, Shailesh Bihari, Julia Brown, Sharon Comerford, La
摘要
Background: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is a life-saving form of cardiopulmonary support for patients with severe refractory cardiopulmonary disease. It is a resource-intensive intervention requiring specialised equipment and personnel, with significant associated costs. This study aimed to determine the costs of care for patients who received ECMO in Australia and New Zealand, and to determine the impact of ECMO-related complications on costs.
Methods: A prospective observational clinical registry analysis was performed using data from 1,345 patients commenced on ECMO in Australia and New Zealand between 2019 and 2022. Per patient resource use was costed based on data from hospital admission to hospital discharge. Key outcomes were mean total patient cost and costs associated with complications. Costs were reported in 2022 Australian Dollars.
Results: Mean costs and daily ECMO costs varied significantly between ECMO modes. While total costs for venovenous (VV) ECMO was significantly more expensive (mean $287,264, standard deviation [SD] $251,193) than venoarterial (VA) ECMO (mean $215,128, SD $162,418) and extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) (mean $121,274, SD $131,893), daily costs while receiving ECMO were least costly for VV ECMO. Complications occurred in 57% of patients. Cost incrementally increased with number of complications. Mean costs were significantly higher in patients with infection (mean $292,197, SD $217,806) compared to those without (mean $161,674, SD $165,175). Key cost drivers were intensive care and hospital length of stay, and ECMO-related procedure costs.
Conclusions: ECMO costs were high, with venovenous ECMO being most expensive due to an increased length of stay. Total patient cost increased with additional ECMO complications. Accurate ECMO costs and complications data can enable informed health budgeting and identification of areas for clinical improvement. (Trial registration: NCT03793257).