性别少数群体慢性疼痛的表型特征及疼痛相关因素:一项横断面研究

Phenotypic characteristics of chronic pain and pain-related factors in gender minority persons: a cross-sectional study

作者信息Grace Merchant, Anamika Ratri, Sharon Fitzgerald Wolff, Nancy Stewart, Courtney Marsh, Quinn Jackson, Annesa Flentje, Miranda McMillan, Emily Schulze, Taylor Cusick, Meredith Gray, Andrea L Chadwick
PMID41452118
期刊Pain
发布时间2026-05-01
DOI10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003900

实验完整度

研究包含横断面调查、问卷评估和统计分析,涉及多个验证层级但缺乏功能实验和机制验证,且为观察性设计。

主要模型

跨性别男性(TGM) 跨性别女性(TGW) 性别扩展(gender-expansive)人群

重点核对

性别认同分类(跨性别男性、跨性别女性、性别扩展) 性别肯定激素治疗类型( masculinizing vs feminizing) 感知压力量表评分 慢性疼痛的存在与广泛性疼痛定义 密苏里州总检察长紧急命令前后调查时间点

摘要

Gender minority (GM) persons have been reported to experience chronic pain at higher rates than the general population, yet comprehensive pain phenotyping in this group remains underexplored. The goal of this cross-sectional study was to characterize chronic pain and pain-related factors in GM persons and examine associations of these characteristics with gender identity and gender-affirming hormone therapy (GHT). One hundred three GM adults completed validated questionnaires assessing pain characteristics and severity, sleep, fatigue, stress, trauma, and the chronic overlapping pain condition (COPC) screener. Participants included those who identify as transgender men (TGM), transgender women (TGW), and gender-expansive persons (all assigned female sex at birth). Overall, 50.5% of the entire cohort reported the presence of chronic pain. Transgender men and gender-expansive persons reported greater pain severity, pain interference, fibromyalgianess, stress, and sleep disturbances compared with TGW. Widespread pain was common (36%-45.8% across groups), and 15.5% of the entire cohort met criteria for fibromyalgia. Transgender men and gender-expansive individuals also had increased numbers of COPCs than TGW. Stress, but not GHT type or gender identity, was significantly associated with chronic pain in multivariable models. Chronic pain and nociplastic symptoms are highly prevalent among GM persons, particularly among TGM and gender-expansive persons, and stress appears to be a key contributor to the pain phenotype. These findings underscore the need for longitudinal research into the biopsychosocial drivers of chronic pain in the GM population and the effects of GHT on pain in GM persons.

实验结论

提炼研究问题、关键发现与证据,快速把握文章的核心贡献。

研究问题
性别少数群体中慢性疼痛的患病率、特征及与性别认同和性别肯定激素治疗的关系如何?
核心机制
感知压力水平较高与慢性疼痛的存在显著相关,提示压力可能驱动疼痛表型差异。
主要证据
横断面调查通过多份问卷评估疼痛表型,发现跨性别男性和性别扩展者的疼痛严重度、干扰、纤维肌痛样症状、神经病理性疼痛评分及睡眠障碍均高于跨性别女性;多变量逻辑回归显示感知压力每增加1分,慢性疼痛几率增加10%(OR=1.10,95%CI 1.03-1.18)。
研究意义
研究支持性别少数群体慢性疼痛负担较高,需进行前瞻性研究以阐明性别肯定激素治疗对疼痛的影响,并考虑生物心理社会机制。

研究路径

按研究推进顺序梳理实验设计、验证步骤与关键观察。

1

参与者招募与分组

获取性别少数群体样本,并按性别认同分组。

从堪萨斯大学医学中心性别多样性诊所和JayDoc免费诊所招募参与者,筛查后纳入符合标准者(年龄≥18岁,能读英语,同意参与),通过电子知情同意后在线完成问卷。最终纳入103人,分为跨性别男性(29人)、跨性别女性(50人)、性别扩展(24人)。

2

数据收集(问卷评估)

评估慢性疼痛表型及疼痛相关因素。

使用REDCap在线调查收集人口统计学、性别肯定激素治疗使用情况、合并用药、临床疼痛评估及多种患者报告结局测量(如简明疼痛量表、密歇根身体图、慢性重叠疼痛条件筛查器、纤维肌痛诊断标准调查评分、儿童期创伤事件量表、PainDETECT、PROMIS-29、感知压力量表、应对策略问卷灾难化量表、性别认同/性别烦躁问卷、UCLA孤独感量表、医疗不信任指数等)。

3

统计分析

比较不同性别认同组间的疼痛表型差异,并识别慢性疼痛的预测因素。

使用SAS 9.4进行统计,分类变量用卡方或Fisher确切检验,连续变量用ANOVA;多变量逻辑回归模型评估慢性疼痛的独特表型预测因子,包含性别认同、性别肯定激素治疗使用、感知压力、医疗不信任和孤独感。敏感性分析探讨性别肯定激素治疗类型对疼痛特征的影响,并比较密苏里州紧急命令前后是否有差异。

研究方法

按研究目的归类文中使用的方法,便于定位所需技术。

产品清单

实验环节名称品牌货号
REDCap----
SAS 9.4版SAS Institute, Inc--

关键环节

汇总复现实验时建议重点确认的条件及原文阅读提示。

环节核对要点
参与者招募
招募地点、纳入标准(年龄、英语能力)、样本量、性别认同分组
阅读提示:Methods - Participants
数据收集
使用的问卷、调查方式(REDCap)、性别肯定激素治疗类型和持续时间
阅读提示:Methods - Study Procedures and Outcome Measures
统计分析
统计检验方法、多变量逻辑回归的变量、显著性水平、敏感性分析
阅读提示:Methods - Statistical Analysis Methods