2007-2019年美国急诊科腹痛就诊、影像学检查及诊断趋势

Trends in visits, imaging, and diagnosis for emergency department abdominal pain presentations in the United States, 2007-2019

作者信息Rachel R Wu, Michael N Adjei-Poku, Rachel R Kelz, Gregory L Peck, Ula Hwang, Anne R Cappola, Ari B Friedman
PMID39313946
发布时间2025-01
DOI10.1111/acem.15017

实验完整度

基于全国代表性回顾性数据,分析多个时间点,包含分层分析和敏感性分析,但无前瞻性干预或机制验证。

主要模型

急诊科腹痛成人患者(18-45岁、46-64岁、65岁及以上)

重点核对

年龄分组:18-45岁、46-64岁、65岁及以上 影像学检查:CT、超声、X光 诊断定义:急诊普外科(EGS)诊断

摘要

Objectives: Abdominal pain is the most common reason for visit (RFV) to the emergency department (ED) for adults, yet no standardized diagnostic pathway exists for abdominal pain. Optimal management is age-specific; symptoms, diagnoses, and prognoses differ between young and old adults. Availability and knowledge of the effectiveness of various imaging modalities have also changed over time. We compared diagnostic imaging rates for younger versus older adults to identify practice patterns of abdominal imaging across age groups over time. Methods: We analyzed weighted, nationally representative data from the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey 2007-2019 for adult ED visits with a primary RFV of abdominal pain. We included 23,364 sampled visits, representing 123 million visits. Results: From 2007 to 2019, total visits increased for ages 18-45 (p < 0.001), 46-64 (p < 0.001), and 65+ (p = 0.032). The percentage of visits with primary RFV of abdominal pain increased from 9.4% to 11.6% for ages 18-45, 7.8%-9.0% for ages 46-64, and 6.0%-6.5% for 65+. Computed tomography (CT) scan rates increased over time from 26.2% of all patients receiving a CT scan to 42.6%. Relative percentage change in abdominal CT scans was greatest for older adults, with a 30.3% increase, compared to 24.0% for middle-aged adults and 15.0% for young adults. Test positivity, defined as receiving an emergency general surgical diagnosis after CT or ultrasound, increased from 17.2% in 2007 to 22.9% in 2019 (p < 0.01). Of the older adults with abdominal pain in 2019, 13% received an X-ray only, which is neither sensitive nor specific for acute pathology in older adults. Conclusions: Despite more abdominal pain ED visits and increased imaging rates per visit, test positivity continues to rise. Our findings do not support claims that CT and ultrasound are being used less appropriately over time, but demonstrate widespread use of X-rays, which are potentially ineffective for abdominal pain.

实验结论

提炼研究问题、关键发现与证据,快速把握文章的核心贡献。

研究问题
2007年至2019年,美国急诊科成人腹痛就诊的影像学检查使用率和诊断结果趋势如何,以及不同年龄组之间是否存在差异?
核心机制
文中未明确说明
主要证据
基于2007-2019年NHAMCS数据,分析23,364次腹痛急诊就诊,发现CT使用率从26.2%上升至42.6%,EGS诊断阳性率从17.2%上升至22.9%,X光使用率下降但仍普遍。
研究意义
研究表明CT和超声使用增加可能带来更多可干预疾病的诊断,但需要将急诊就诊与30天结局联系起来的数据源,以确定这些上升的影像学驱动诊断率是否能改善健康。

研究路径

按研究推进顺序梳理实验设计、验证步骤与关键观察。

1

数据来源与样本选择

获取具有全国代表性的急诊科腹痛就诊样本

使用国家医院门诊医疗护理调查(NHAMCS)2007-2019年数据,纳入以腹痛为首要就诊原因的成人急诊就诊记录。

2

变量定义与分组

定义关键变量和年龄分组,以分析不同年龄段人群的影像学使用和诊断趋势

将年龄分为18-45、46-64、65+三组,定义影像学检查(CT、超声、X光)和急诊普外科(EGS)诊断。

3

统计分析

评估影像学使用和诊断随时间的变化趋势,并比较不同年龄组之间的差异

使用加权描述性统计、卡方检验和线性概率模型分析趋势。

研究方法

按研究目的归类文中使用的方法,便于定位所需技术。

关键环节

汇总复现实验时建议重点确认的条件及原文阅读提示。

环节核对要点
数据来源
使用NHAMCS 2007-2019年数据,包含腹痛为首要就诊原因
阅读提示:Methods: Study design and data source
样本纳入
纳入成人(>=18岁)腹痛就诊
阅读提示:Methods: Participants
年龄分组
年龄分为18-45、46-64、65+三组
阅读提示:Methods: Participants
影像学检查定义
CT、超声、X光检查的定义和记录方式
阅读提示:Methods: Variables
诊断定义
EGS诊断的定义和编码
阅读提示:Methods: Variables
统计分析
加权描述性统计、卡方检验、线性概率模型
阅读提示:Methods: Statistical methods