• 我要登录|
  • 免费注册
    |
  • 我的丁香通
    • 企业机构:
    • 成为企业机构
    • 个人用户:
    • 个人中心
  • 移动端
    移动端
丁香通 logo丁香实验_LOGO
搜实验

    大家都在搜

      大家都在搜

        0 人通过求购买到了急需的产品
        免费发布求购
        发布求购
        点赞
        收藏
        wx-share
        分享

        Saturation Analysis of Ligand Binding Using a Centrifugation Procedure

        互联网

        635
        • Abstract
        • Table of Contents
        • Materials
        • Figures
        • Literature Cited

        Abstract

         

        The use of filtration assays is often unsuitable for radioligands with rapid dissociation rates. Rapid dissociation may result in the loss of significant amounts of bound ligand during the separation of bound from free ligand associated with filtration. The primary advantage of the centrifugation assay for characterizing the binding of a radioligand is that the bound ligand is separated from free ligand without initiating significant ligand dissociation from its receptor. Nonetheless, the small volume of supernatant that remains trapped within the membrane pellet (even after a superficial rinsing of the pellet surface) often results in an increased nonspecific binding compared to filtration techniques. The unit presents a protocol for the binding of [3 H]glycine to the glycine recognition site of the NMDA receptor complex. This assay is commonly employed because of the current lack of high?affinity agonist ligands that interact with this recognition site. The use of other radioligands may require different tissue preparations, buffer systems, and assay conditions, but the basic steps involving sedimentation of the pellet, removal of supernatant, superficial washing of the pellet surface, and solubilization of the pellet will remain the same.

             
         
        GO TO THE FULL PROTOCOL:
        PDF or HTML at Wiley Online Library

        Table of Contents

        • Commentary
        • Figures
        • Tables
             
         
        GO TO THE FULL PROTOCOL:
        PDF or HTML at Wiley Online Library

        Materials

        Basic Protocol 1:

          Materials
        • Rats
        • HTS‐sucrose: 5 mM HEPES/4.5 mM Tris⋅Cl /320 mM sucrose, pH 7.4, ice cold
        • HTS: 5 mM HEPES/4.5 mM Tris⋅Cl, pH 7.4 , ice cold (store up to 2 weeks in a cold room)
        • HTS‐EDTA: 5 mM HEPES/4.5 mM Tris⋅Cl /1 mM EDTA, pH 7.4 (pH adjusted, if necessary, with concentrated HEPES‐free acid or Tris‐free base), ice cold
        • Unlabeled ligand
        • [3 H]glycine (30 to 60 Ci/mmol; NEN Life Science)
        • TS‐2 tissue solubilizer (Research Products)
        • Glacial acetic acid
        • Dissection tools
        • Dry ice
        • Sorvall RC‐5B refrigerated superspeed centrifuge and SH‐MT and SS‐34 rotors (DuPont), or equivalent
        • 1.5‐ml O‐ring screw‐cap test tubes and screw‐cap microtube rack (Sarstedt)
        • Repeating pipettor (Brinkmann)
        • Brinkmann Dispensette (Fisher)
        • Rat guillotine or veterinary toenail clippers
        • Whatman filter paper
        GO TO THE FULL PROTOCOL:
        PDF or HTML at Wiley Online Library

        Figures

        •   Figure Figure 7.7.1 The results of a typical assay in which unlabeled glycine has been used to displace [3 H]glycine (100 nM) in well‐washed cortical membranes (163 µg/tube protein in this example) from a male NIH‐Swiss mouse. In this representative experiment, the IC50 of glycine was 479 nM and B 0 (basal binding in the absence of a competitive inhibitor) was 1219 fmol/mg protein. Total binding was 376 fmol/tube and nonspecific binding was 183 fmol/tube. Specific binding in this assay should be in the 50% to 60% range (51% in this example).
          View Image

        Videos

        Literature Cited

        GO TO THE FULL PROTOCOL:
        PDF or HTML at Wiley Online Library
         
        ad image
        提问
        扫一扫
        丁香实验小程序二维码
        实验小助手
        丁香实验公众号二维码
        扫码领资料
        反馈
        TOP
        打开小程序